DocketNumber: 08-51124
Citation Numbers: 349 F. App'x 948
Judges: Haynes, King, Per Curiam, Stewart
Filed Date: 10/21/2009
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/2/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2009 No. 08-51124 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GENARO CENICEROS, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-1209-1 Before KING, STEWART and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Genaro Ceniceros pleaded guilty to importing and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana. The district court sentenced Ceniceros to 21 months of imprisonment, a term at the bottom of the guidelines range. Ceniceros appeals his sentence, arguing that he was entitled to a two-level reduction in his offense level under U.S.S.G § 3B1.2(b) as a minor participant in the drug-trafficking operation. * Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-51124 Ceniceros has not met his burden to establish that he played only a minor role in the offense. See Burton v. United States,237 F.3d 490
, 503 (5th Cir. 2000). Ceniceros’s sentence was based entirely on the conduct that he was directly involved in and the quantity of drugs that he personally transported; thus, a minor-role adjustment was not required even if he played only a small part in a large enterprise. See United States v. Garcia,242 F.3d 593
, 598-99 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Atanda,60 F.3d 196
, 199 (5th Cir. 1995). In any event, Ceniceros’s argument that he should have received the adjustment because he was merely a drug courier with little knowledge of the smuggling operation is unavailing. A courier is often “indispensable” to a drug-smuggling operation, United States v. Buenrostro,868 F.2d 135
, 138 (5th Cir. 1989), and thus is not automatically entitled to a minor-role adjustment. United States v. Jenkins,487 F.3d 279
, 282 (5th Cir. 2007). Ceniceros’s role in transporting over 25 kilograms of drugs across the border was more than peripheral; therefore, the district court did not clearly err in finding that he was not a minor participant. See United States v. Villanueva,408 F.3d 193
, 203-04 (5th Cir. 2005). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2
United States v. Atanda , 60 F.3d 196 ( 1995 )
United States v. Garcia , 242 F.3d 593 ( 2001 )
United States v. Jenkins , 487 F.3d 279 ( 2007 )
United States v. Leonard Orozco Buenrostro , 868 F.2d 135 ( 1989 )
United States v. Villanueva , 408 F.3d 193 ( 2005 )