DocketNumber: 01-51248
Filed Date: 11/14/2002
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/21/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-51248 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MIGUEL ANGEL VALIENTE, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-469-3-DB - - - - - - - - - - November 13, 2002 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Miguel Angel Valiente appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marihuana and possession with intent to distribute marihuana in violation of21 U.S.C. §§ 841
& 846. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he knew of the marihuana or the conspiracy. In particular, he argues that the testimony of two special agents of the United States Customs Service that they observed him * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-51248 -2- unloading bundles of marihuana from a van is incredible as a matter of law. We find that the testimony of the special agents was not incredible as a matter of law but rather involved a credibility determination for the jury. See United States v. Green,180 F.3d 216
, 221-22 (5th Cir. 1999). Construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence was sufficient to establish Valiente’s knowledge and possession of the marihuana and his participation in the conspiracy to distribute it. See United States v. Miller,146 F.3d 274
, 280-81 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Casilla,20 F.3d 600
, 603 (5th Cir. 1994). AFFIRMED.