United States v. Fuente-Aguilera

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41542
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE MARCO ANTONIO FUENTE-AGUILERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-906-ALL
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Marco Antonio Fuente-Aguilera appeals his guilty-plea
conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by
being found in the United States without permission after
deportation. He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530
U.S. 466 (2000), that the 40-month term of imprisonment imposed
in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for
the offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the
constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-41542
-2-
aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than
elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.
Fuente-Aguilera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by
Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998).
Although Fuente-Aguilera contends that Almendarez-Torres was
incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court
would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we have
repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that
Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v.
Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S.
Ct. 298 (2005). Fuente-Aguilera properly concedes that his
argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit
precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further
review.
AFFIRMED.