DocketNumber: 18-30693
Filed Date: 1/22/2019
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021
Case: 18-30693 Document: 00514803554 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 18-30693 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar January 22, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. SIR MASTER FORD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:17-CR-269-1 Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sir Master Ford appeals the sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court erred in denying him credit for the time he served between his May 1, 2018 arrest and May 21, 2018 revocation. The district court lacked jurisdiction to compute Ford’s credit under18 U.S.C. § 3585
(b) for previous time served because the Attorney General and * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-30693 Document: 00514803554 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2019 No. 18-30693 the Bureau of Prisons are responsible for computing this credit. See United States v. Wilson,503 U.S. 329
, 334-37 (1992); United States v. Hankton,875 F.3d 786
, 792 (5th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, the judgment is REFORMED to remove the statement “[n]o credit shall be granted for time served.” The judgment is otherwise AFFIRMED. 2