United States v. Antonio Molina-Ortega

Case: 13-50367 Document: 00512598452 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-50367
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANTONIO DE JESUS MOLINA-ORTEGA, also known as Tony K. Molina, also
known as Antonio De Jesus Ortega-Molina, also known as Martin M.
Contreras, also known as Tony Molina, also known as Antonio Dejesus Molina-
Ortega, also known as Karrel Ortega, also known as Karvel Ortega, also known
as Javier Salas, also known as Joseph Shokrian, also known as Joseph H.
Shokrian, also known as Karvell Ortega, also known as Karel Ortega, also
known as Antonio D. Molina-Ortega, also known as Antonio Jesus Molina-
Ortega, also known as Martin Contreras, also known as Aniceto Molina, also
known as Johnnie Molina, also known as Antonio Ortega, also known as
Antonio Molina, also known as Antonio Karel Molina, also known as Antonio
Molina-Ortega, also known as Joseph Hassan Shokrian,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:11-CR-165-1
USDC No. 5:11-CR-1025-1
Case: 13-50367 Document: 00512598452 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-50367
Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Antonio De Jesus Molina-Ortega
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Ortega has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Molina-Ortega’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2