DocketNumber： 22-10842
Filed Date： 6/9/2023
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 6/10/2023
Case: 22-10842 Document: 00516781755 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10842 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ June 9, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jose Hugo Gonzalez Hernandez, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-305-1 ______________________________ Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Hugo Gonzalez Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores,632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez Hernandez has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Gonzalez _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10842 Document: 00516781755 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/09/2023 No. 22-10842 Hernandez’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider them without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar,739 F.3d 829
, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 2