DocketNumber: 93-5608
Citation Numbers: 43 F.3d 1033, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 214, 1995 WL 13861
Judges: Merritt, Keith, Kennedy, Martin, Jones, Milburn, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder, Daughtrey
Filed Date: 1/4/1995
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
43 F.3d 1033
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David W. LANIER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-5608.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Jan. 4, 1995.
Prior Report: 33 F.3d 639.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
United States v. Lanier , 173 F. Supp. 2d 779 ( 2001 )
Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc. , 2 F. Supp. 2d 1409 ( 1998 )
United States v. Lanier , 117 S. Ct. 1219 ( 1997 )
United States v. Lanier ( 2000 )
United States v. Jackson ( 2008 )
united-states-of-america-plaintiff-appelleecross-appellant-95-5357-v , 97 F.3d 835 ( 1996 )
United States v. Gray , 521 F.3d 514 ( 2008 )
United States v. Ruth Alston Breeding , 109 F.3d 308 ( 1997 )
Grant v. Rivers , 920 F. Supp. 769 ( 1996 )
Gary Randall Hoxsie v. Dareld Kerby, Warden Tom Udall, ... , 108 F.3d 1239 ( 1997 )