United States v. Richard Robinson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 21-1629
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Richard Darnell Robinson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central
____________
Submitted: September 3, 2021
Filed: September 9, 2021
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Richard Robinson appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he
plead guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed
1
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive
reasonableness of the sentence.
After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Robinson, as there was no indication that it overlooked a
relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in
weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881
(8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); and the sentence was within the United States
Sentencing Guidelines Manual range, see United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754,
760 (8th Cir. 2014) (“A sentence which falls within the guideline range is presumed
to be reasonable[.]”). Furthermore, having independently reviewed the record under
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-