United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1714
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eldon Philip Anderson
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
___________________________
No. 17-3183
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Eldon Philip Anderson
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeals from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
______________
Submitted: October 23, 2017
Filed: November 6, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Eldon Anderson, proceeding pro se, appeals the
district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release, and also appeals the district
court’s2 denial of his motion for release pending appeal. Anderson argues on appeal,
inter alia, that the government failed to prove he violated the terms of his supervised
release.
After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we
reject Anderson’s challenge to the district court’s determination that he violated the
terms of his supervised release. See United States v. Black Bear, 542 F.3d 249, 252
(8th Cir. 2008) (finding as to whether violation occurred is reviewed for clear error).
We conclude that Anderson’s additional arguments are also unavailing, and therefore
affirm the judgment revoking his supervised release. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We further
dismiss as moot Anderson’s appeal from the denial of his motion for release pending
appeal, and deny as moot his motion for an expedited appeal.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
2
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-