Sherman Meirovitz v. Anthony Haynes

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-3726
___________________________
Sherman Ray Meirovitz
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Anthony Haynes, Warden, FCI - Forrest City
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: July 14, 2014
Filed: July 17, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Sherman Meirovitz appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition, in which he raised the same claim that was rejected by this court in
his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See Meirovitz v. United States, 688 F.3d 369, 370-
72 (8th Cir. 2012). After careful review, we agree with the district court that
Meirovitz did not show the section 2255 remedy was inadequate or ineffective. See
Lopez-Lopez v. Sanders, 590 F.3d 905, 907 (8th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H.
David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-