DocketNumber: 17-2733
Filed Date: 12/3/2018
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/3/2018
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-2733 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Jerrell Henderson lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul ____________ Submitted: October 15, 2018 Filed: December 3, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before SMITH, Chief Judge, LOKEN and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Jerrell Henderson pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 72 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Henderson argues that the district court1 procedurally erred in classifying his Minnesota conviction for first- degree aggravated robbery2 as a “crime of violence.” See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1). “The term ‘crime of violence’ means any offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that . . . has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another . . . .”Id. This subparagraph
is known “as the ‘force clause.’” United States v. Schneider,905 F.3d 1088
, 1090 (8th Cir. 2018). “Based on their nearly identical definitions, we construe ‘violent felony’ under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) (the Armed Career Criminal Act) and ‘crime of violence’ under the Guidelines as interchangeable, including the corresponding force clauses and residual clauses.” United States v. Boose,739 F.3d 1185
, 1187 n.1 (8th Cir. 2014). We have held that “simple robbery in Minnesota—and as a result, first degree aggravated robbery—qualifies as a predicate offense under the ACCA.” United States v. Libby,880 F.3d 1011
, 1015–16 (8th Cir. 2018). Therefore, it follows that first- degree aggravated robbery in Minnesota constitutes a crime of violence under the Guidelines. SeeBoose, 739 F.3d at 1187
n.1. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. 2 Minn. Stat. § 609.245, subd. 1. -2-