DocketNumber: 98-3280
Citation Numbers: 6 F. App'x 526
Judges: Hansen, Arnold, Bye
Filed Date: 4/24/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3280 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Michael Byers, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: April 20, 2001 Filed: April 24, 2001 ___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Byers pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Because he had refused to identify any of his drug suppliers or customers to the government, citing his religious and moral beliefs, the district court1 denied his request for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(5), and sentenced him to 120 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Byers challenges the denial on appeal. 1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. We conclude that Byers did not satisfy the requirements for safety-valve relief, and that the district court did not clearly err in denying it. See United States v. Tournier,171 F.3d 645
, 647 (8th Cir. 1999) (standard of review); United States v. Santana,150 F.3d 860
, 864 (8th Cir. 1998) (defendant carries burden of demonstrating that he has truthfully provided to government all information he knows about relevant crime); United States v. Romo,81 F.3d 84
, 85 (8th Cir. 1996) (to receive safety-valve relief, defendant is obligated to provide information about identities and participation of others involved in chain of distribution); cf. United States v. McQuay,7 F.3d 800
, 802-03 (8th Cir. 1993) (requiring defendant to incriminate self to “reap the benefit of” acceptance-of-responsibility reduction does not punish him for exercise of Fifth Amendment right). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-