DocketNumber: 99-1383
Filed Date: 2/28/2000
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 99-1383NI _____________ United States of America, * * On Appeal from the United Appellee, * States District Court * for the Northern District v. * of Iowa. * Martin Becerra, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: February 17, 2000 Filed: February 28, 2000 ___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Martin Becerra appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 upon his guilty plea to distribution and aiding and abetting the distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The District Court sentenced Becerra to four years and nine months imprisonment and four years supervised release. For reversal, Becerra argues the District Court clearly erred in denying him an 1 The Hon. Michael J. Melloy, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. adjustment for his role in the offense, especially when a co-defendant received a four- level minimal-role reduction. Becerra was not entitled to a mitigating-role reduction merely because his co- defendant received one. See United States v. Jones,145 F.3d 959
, 963 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied,119 S. Ct. 457
(1998). According to the uncontested factual allegations contained in his presentence report, Becerra’s wife had arranged a drug transaction; he accompanied her to a meeting place with knowledge that the activity was somehow drug-related; and, in response to his wife’s signal, he had a brief discussion with a co- defendant shortly before the co-defendant placed methamphetamine in an undercover vehicle. We conclude the District Court did not clearly err in finding that Becerra was “fully involved” in this transaction and in denying Becerra’s request for a mitigating- role reduction. SeeJones, 145 F.3d at 963
; United States v. McGrady,97 F.3d 1042
, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-