DocketNumber: 03-1389
Filed Date: 11/7/2003
Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/13/2015
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 03-1389 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Jose Luis Reyes-Contreras, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. * ________________ Submitted: October 23, 2003 Filed: November 7, 2003 ________________ Before BYE, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ________________ PER CURIAM. Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Jose Luis Reyes-Contreras pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of a substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of21 U.S.C. § 846
(2000). He acknowledged that by pleading guilty, he was subjecting himself to a statutory minimum penalty of ten years in prison and five years of supervised release. At sentencing, the district court1 imposed the statutory minimum sentence: a ten-year prison term and a five-year term of supervised release. Reyes-Contreras subsequently moved to withdraw his guilty plea, have new counsel appointed, and have a new sentencing hearing conducted. The district court denied his motion. Reyes-Contreras appeals. Reyes-Contreras cannot challenge his conviction or sentence on appeal because he received precisely what he bargained for in the plea agreement. See United States v. Nguyen,46 F.3d 781
, 783 (8th Cir. 1995). The district court properly denied Reyes-Contreras's motion to withdraw his plea because it was filed after sentence was imposed. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e) (2002). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 2