DocketNumber: 03-2988
Citation Numbers: 101 F. App'x 179
Judges: Bye, McMillian, Per Curiam, Riley
Filed Date: 6/14/2004
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-2988 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Janis Kreitinger, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States ---------------- * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee, * * v. * * Janis Kreitinger, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: June 4, 2004 Filed: June 14, 2004 ___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Janis Kreitinger (Kreitinger) pled guilty to credit card and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2), 1343, and 3147(1). The district court1 sentenced Kreitinger to a total term of 46 months imprisonment to be followed by concurrent 3- and 5-year terms of supervised release. The court also ordered Kreitinger to pay restitution of $1,881.03. Kreitinger appeals. Her counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), and Kreitinger has filed a pro se supplemental brief. After careful review, we reject counsel’s argument that the court plainly erred in failing to determine Kreitinger’s understanding of applicable Guidelines enhancements. See United States v. Vonn,535 U.S. 55
, 58-59 (2002) (defendant who allows Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 error to pass without objection in trial court must satisfy plain-error rule, i.e., that claimed plain error affected defendant’s substantial rights); United States v. Bond,135 F.3d 1247
, 1248 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (at plea hearing, district court not obligated to inform defendant of applicable Guidelines range or actual sentence), cert. denied,524 U.S. 961
(1998). Kreitinger’s claims of ineffective assistance are not properly before us. See United States v. Martin,59 F.3d 767
, 771 (8th Cir. 1995). Having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing the record as required under Penson v. Ohio,488 U.S. 75
, 80 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we deny Kreitinger’s motion for new counsel. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-