DocketNumber: 21-3384
Filed Date: 5/31/2022
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 5/31/2022
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3384 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Otis Ray Mays, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 21-3385 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Otis Ray Mays, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeals from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: May 13, 2022 Filed: May 31, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Otis Mays appeals the district court’s1 reimposition of a special condition of supervised release limiting his computer use and internet access, following this court’s remand for resentencing on his wire fraud and child pornography convictions. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by reimposing the special condition. See United States v. Jennings,930 F.3d 1024
, 1026 (8th Cir. 2019) (reviewing imposition of special conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion). The district court adequately explained why it reimposed the special condition, and, because it did not clearly err in finding that Mays’s offense involved computer use and internet access, the special condition was reasonably related to the18 U.S.C. § 3553
(a) factors. See United States v. Turner,781 F.3d 374
, 393 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing factual findings for clear error); United States v. Wiedower,634 F.3d 490
, 493 (8th Cir. 2011) (discussing district court’s broad discretion to impose special conditions that are reasonably related to the § 3553 factors, involve no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary, and are consistent with any pertinent Sentencing Commission policy statements). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ 1 The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-