Michael Wofford v. North Little Rock School Dist

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1730
___________________________
Michael Wofford
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
North Little Rock School District
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: December 17, 2019
Filed: December 20, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Wofford, parent of J.W., appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment
in his action seeking attorneys’ fees under the Individuals with Disabilities Education
1
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
Act (IDEA). Upon de novo review, we agree with the district court that Wofford was
not a prevailing party entitled to fees. See Birmingham v. Omaha Sch. Dist., 298 F.3d
731, 734 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review); Borengasser v. Ark. State Bd. of Educ.,
996 F.2d 196, 200 (8th Cir. 1993) (to succeed in action seeking attorneys’ fees under
IDEA, plaintiff must be prevailing party). Specifically, as the relief ordered by the
hearing officer required Wofford’s action, which he did not take before moving J.W.
out of the district and precluding implementation of the relief, Wofford cannot be
considered a prevailing party. See Drennan v. Pulaski Cty. Special Sch. Dist., 458
F.3d 755, 757 (8th Cir. 2006) (parent who succeeded on IDEA claim at administrative
level was not prevailing party, because ordered relief required parent to provide
records to school, but parent instead moved child to another district, and relief was
not implemented).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-