Crylstalline Bailey v. Anchor Packaging

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-4272
___________
CRYSTALLINE S. BAILEY, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
ANCHOR PACKAGING, etc., * Eastern District of Arkansas
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 14, 2000
Filed: June 29, 2000
___________
Before WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and PANNER,1 District Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
1
The Honorable Owen M. Panner, United States District Judge for the District
of Oregon, sitting by designation.
Plaintiff Crystalline S. Bailey appeals the district court's2 grant of summary
judgment for defendant Anchor Packaging on plaintiff's employment discrimination
claims. We have reviewed the matter de novo and conclude that the evidence,
considered in the light most favorable to Bailey, shows that there is no genuine issue
of material fact and that defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See
Treanor v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 200 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir. 2000). The district
court correctly ruled that defendant took prompt and appropriate remedial action after
plaintiff complained that a co-worker had sexually harassed her. See Scusa v. Nestle
U.S.A. Co., 181 F.3d 958, 967 (8th Cir. 1999).
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
ATTEST:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2
The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-2-