United States v. Cheryl Anderson

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1484
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Cheryl Y. Anderson,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: September 19, 2013
Filed: September 24, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Cheryl Anderson appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed upon
revoking her probation. She argues only that the district court committed procedural
1
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
error by selecting a sentence based on “clearly erroneous facts.” After careful review,
we conclude that the district court based its sentencing decision on appropriate
considerations and that no abuse of discretion occurred. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 919, 922 (8th Cir. 2009) (appellate court reviews probation revocation
sentence for abuse of discretion, using same standards as those applied to initial
sentencing decisions). Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-