DocketNumber: 00-2235
Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Arnold
Filed Date: 1/10/2001
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2235 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri Will H. Hawkins, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: January 4, 2001 Filed: January 10, 2001 ___________ Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Will H. Hawkins appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Western District of Missouri following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(a)(2). The district court sentenced appellant to 30 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. For reversal appellant argues the district court erred in calculating his base offense level 1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (applicable to, inter alia, a defendant with a prior felony conviction for “a crime of violence”), because his undisputed prior conviction for second-degree burglary of a commercial building, i.e., a gun store, did not constitute “a crime of violence” as contemplated by the Guidelines. As appellant concedes, in United States v. Hascall,76 F.3d 902
, 906 (8th Cir.), cert. denied,519 U.S. 948
(1996), a panel of this court determined that second-degree burglaries of commercial buildings are indeed crimes of violence. We are not at liberty to overrule another panel’s decision. See United States v. Reynolds,116 F.3d 328
, 329 (8th Cir. 1997) (refusing to consider argument that Hascall was wrongly decided). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-