Jimmy J. Micius v. City of St. Paul

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1918
___________
Jimmy J. Micius; Elsie M. Mayard, *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
City of St. Paul; John M. Harrington, *
Chief of Police, St. Paul Police * [UNPUBLISHED]
Department; Officer Etienne; Officer *
Yunker; Officer Cheshier; John Does; *
Jane Roes, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 3, 2009
Filed: November 10, 2009
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Jimmy J. Micius and Elsie Mayard appeal following the district court’s1 adverse
grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully
reviewed the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006)
1
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
(standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was properly granted for the
reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.2
______________________________
2
We decline to address the issues appellants raise for the first time on appeal.
See Snider v. United States, 468 F.3d 500, 512 (8th Cir. 2006).
-2-