DocketNumber: 06-3707
Judges: Bye, Riley, Melloy
Filed Date: 10/12/2007
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3707 ___________ Patrick Fitzgerald Ester, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Agent Daniel Paul Faflak, Jr.; * [UNPUBLISHED] Detective David Sebesta, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: October 3, 2007 Filed: October 12, 2007 ___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Patrick Fitzgerald Ester appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment based on qualified immunity. We have carefully reviewed the record and considered Ester’s arguments for reversal. See Robinette v. Jones,476 F.3d 585
, 590- 91 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo standard of review). We agree with the district court that the question whether defendants reasonably believed their actions violated the Fourth 1 The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. Amendment turns on the objective reasonableness of their conduct and not on their subjective intent. See McClendon v. Story County Sheriff’s Office,403 F.3d 510
, 515-16 & n.4 (8th Cir. 2005) (officer’s subjective intent is never relevant under Fourth Amendment analysis so long as there exists objective basis for seizure). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Ester’s motion to supplement the record. ______________________________ -2-