DocketNumber: 05-1508
Citation Numbers: 177 F. App'x 507
Filed Date: 4/13/2006
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-1508 ___________ Charles E. Goods, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Crown Center Complex; Boulevard * Western District of Missouri. Blues Clothing Store; Nova * Partnership, doing business as * [UNPUBLISHED] American Heartland Theater; * Hallmark Global Services, Inc.; * Kessinger/Hunter Management * Company, Inc., * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: April 7, 2006 Filed: April 13, 2006 ___________ Before BYE, MAGILL, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Goods appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII employment-discrimination suit. After de novo review, we agree with 1 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. the district court that the non-employer defendants were not liable, and that Goods failed to create trialworthy issues on whether he was terminated because of his race or suffered retaliation because of engaging in protected activity. See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.,530 U.S. 133
, 143 (2000) (burden-shifting analysis); Knieriem v. Group Health Plan, Inc.,434 F.3d 1058
, 1060 (8th Cir. 2006) (de novo review of Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); Johnson v. AT&T Corp.,422 F.3d 756
, 760 (8th Cir. 2005) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment). Further, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appointment of counsel, see Phillips v. Jasper County Jail,437 F.3d 791
, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review and relevant factors); or in refusing to compel production of a purported court order to monitor Goods, see Sallis v. Univ. of Minn.,408 F.3d 470
, 477 (8th Cir. 2005) (review of discovery rulings is narrow and deferential). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Goods’s pending motions. ______________________________ -2-
James H. Sallis v. University of Minnesota , 408 F.3d 470 ( 2005 )
David Knieriem, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ... , 434 F.3d 1058 ( 2006 )
James Edward Phillips v. Jasper County Jail Cabalero Eby ... , 437 F.3d 791 ( 2006 )
Michael Johnson v. At & T Corp. , 422 F.3d 756 ( 2005 )
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. , 120 S. Ct. 2097 ( 2000 )