DocketNumber: 07-2979
Citation Numbers: 280 F. App'x 562
Filed Date: 6/9/2008
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-2979 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Luis Mariles-Santos, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: May 26, 2008 Filed: June 9, 2008 ___________ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Luis Mariles-Santos challenges the reasonableness of his 19-month within- Guidelines-range prison sentence, which the district court1 imposed after Mariles- Santos pleaded guilty to illegally entering the United States after deportation following a felony conviction, in violation of8 U.S.C. § 1326
(a), (b)(1). We conclude that Mariles-Santos’s sentence is not unreasonable and therefore was not abuse of the district court’s discretion. See United States v. Haack,403 F.3d 1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 997, 1003 (8th Cir. 2005) (abuse-of-discretion review standard). The court specifically acknowledged the advisory nature of the Guidelines and referenced several of the18 U.S.C. § 3553
(a) sentencing factors, and nothing in the record indicates that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or made a clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors. See Rita v. United States,127 S. Ct. 2456
, 2462-68 (2007) (allowing appellate presumption of reasonableness for within-Guidelines-range sentence); United States v. Clay,524 F.3d 877
, 878 (8th Cir. 2008) (applying presumption); Haack, 403 F.3d at 1004 (listing circumstances that may warrant finding of abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-