DocketNumber: 16-4524
Judges: Benton, Murphy, Erickson
Filed Date: 2/14/2018
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-4524 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Antonio Deshawn Thomas lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport ____________ Submitted: February 6, 2018 Filed: February 14, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________ Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Antonio Thomas directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), asserting that an error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(B) occurred during the change-of-plea hearing, and that Thomas’s sentence was substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review, we conclude that no plain error occurred, see United States v. Dominguez Benitez,542 U.S. 74
, 76 (2004) (plain-error standard applies where Rule 11 omission was not preserved by timely objection; defendant must show that, but for such omission, he would not have entered plea); and that Thomas’s sentence is not substantively unreasonable, see United States v. Feemster,572 F.3d 455
, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard; discussing substantive reasonableness); see also United States v. Callaway,762 F.3d 754
, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (on appeal, within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumed reasonable). In addition, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,488 U.S. 75
(1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________ -2-