Vincent Argentino v. Ruanne Stamps

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-2348
___________________________
Vincent A. Argentino
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Corizon Medical Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Ruanne Stamps, Dr.; Narendrasinh Khengar, Dr.; Rex Hardman, Dr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Reuben Thacker, Dr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Glen Babbich, Dr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Dr. Thomas Kevin Bredeman, Regional Medical Director
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Amanda Verdot, Nurse; Samantha Lucas, Nurse; Hanna Wingate, Nurse; Matthew
W. Pittman, Nurse
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
Cheryl Clad, Nurse; Patricia King, Nurse; Cheryl Galberth, Nurse
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
Pamela Swartz, Nurse Practitioner
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
Ashok Kumar Chada, Dr.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City
____________
Submitted: March 24, 2020
Filed: March 27, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Missouri inmate Vincent A. Argentino appeals
the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Construing the record in a
light most favorable to Argentino, and drawing all inferences in his favor, we find
that the grant of summary judgment to defendants was proper, see Cullor v. Baldwin,
830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review); and we find no error in the
1
The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
-2-
district court orders denying Argentino’s various motions. The judgment is affirmed,
see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and appellant’s motions for oral argument, and the parties’
motions for supplemental briefing, are denied.
______________________________
-3-