DocketNumber： 19-2020
Filed Date： 2/6/2020
Status： Non-Precedential
Modified Date： 2/6/2020
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2020 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Kendrick Dotstry lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________ Submitted: January 30, 2020 Filed: February 6, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Kendrick Dotstry appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Upon careful review of the record, including the well-reasoned opinion of the 1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. district court, we conclude there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of post- judgment relief. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage,408 F.3d 1043
, 1045 (8th Cir. 2005) (court reviews denial of Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion; Rule 60(b) authorizes relief in only most exceptional cases). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-