J.S. Haren Company v. Fairfield Service Company

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3192
___________________________
J.S. Haren Company
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Fairfield Service Company of Indiana, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs
____________
Submitted: September 21, 2020
Filed: September 24, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Fairfield Services Company of Indiana appeals the adverse judgment entered
by the district court1 following a bench trial in a diversity action raising claims under
1
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
Arkansas state law. Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not err
in determining that the equipment supplied by Fairfield was defective, that Fairfield
failed to timely cure the nonconformities, and that the buyer’s revocation of
acceptance was timely and appropriate. See United States v. Missouri, 535 F.3d 844,
848 (8th Cir. 2008) (in appeal from civil bench trial, findings of fact are reviewed for
clear error, conclusions of law and mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed de
novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-