United States v. Adam Rouillard

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-2474
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Adam Rouillard,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
___________________________
No. 16-2476
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Adam Rouillard,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeals from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City
____________
Submitted: February 3, 2017
Filed: February 8, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In these consolidated appeals, Adam Rouillard challenges the sentence the
district court1 imposed upon revoking his second term of supervised release. In each
case, his counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief questioning
the reasonableness of Rouillard’s revocation sentence. Rouillard has not filed a
supplemental brief.
After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in sentencing Rouillard. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d
910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); see also United States v. Perkins,
526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court reviews entire sentencing record,
not merely district court’s statements at hearing).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw, and we affirm
the judgment of the district court.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa.
-2-