DocketNumber: 21-3657
Filed Date: 6/6/2023
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 6/6/2023
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-3657 ___________________________ Estate of James Earl Turner, Lauren Turner Boyd as co-personal representative, Estate of James Earl Turner, Deceased lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Calhoun County Sheriff's Department lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant Vernon Morris, Sheriff Calhoun County, individually and in his official capacity as Calhoun County Sheriff; Jarad Hennegan, individually and in his official capacity as Calhoun County Jail Administrator; Tom Turner, individually and in his official capacity as an agent of the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department; Glenn Johnson, individually and in his official capacity as an agent of Calhoun County lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees Arkansas Association of Counties lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado ____________ Submitted: January 11, 2023 Filed: June 6, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRASZ, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. The Estate of James Turner brought this42 U.S.C. § 1983
action against a sheriff’s department and several officials after James Turner died of chronic alcoholism and hypertensive cardiovascular disease while in the department’s custody. The complaint alleged deliberate indifference to Turner’s serious medical needs in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court1 granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment finding no constitutional violation and finding in the alternative no violation of a clearly established right as required to defeat qualified immunity. In particular, the district court determined Turner suffered from a serious medical condition but the defendants did not subjectively appreciate that his medical condition was serious. The district court also determined the defendants were not deliberately indifferent in that they twice offered, and Turner twice rejected, medical care. Finally, the district court granted summary judgment as to official-capacity claims and declined to retain jurisdiction over related state-law claims. The district court based its ruling in large part on facts as asserted by the defendants in a statement of material undisputed facts. The Estate did not file a separate responsive statement of facts. Accordingly, by local rule, the district court deemed the factual assertions in defendants’ statement to be admitted. See W.D. Ark. L.R. 56.1(c). On appeal, the Estate does not present legal argument related to the substantive standards governing its deliberate indifference claim or qualified immunity. Rather, 1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. -2- the Estate identifies general summary judgment standards and the need to draw reasonable inferences in the non-moving party’s favor. Then the Estate cites four statements of fact from the district court’s order with accompanying citations to the summary judgment record to purportedly contradict the district court’s statements. As to each one of the four, however, any purported distinction is either (1) an impermissible and belated attempt to contest a previously uncontested statement from the defendants’ statement of facts or (2) immaterial in that it does not demonstrate the existence of a material dispute of fact when measured against the substantive legal standards governing this case. Accordingly, we conclude the Estate has presented no meaningful basis to disturb the district court’s ruling. See Libel v. Adventure Lands of America, Inc.,482 F.3d 1028
, 1033 (8th Cir. 2007) (finding no abuse of a district court’s discretion in applying an analogous local rule and treating a defendant’s unchallenged statement of facts as admitted, stating, “The district court was not obliged to scour the record looking for factual disputes.”). We affirm the judgment of the district court. ______________________________ -3-