DocketNumber: 13-56134
Citation Numbers: 588 F. App'x 637
Judges: Wallace, Leavy, Bybee
Filed Date: 12/16/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 16 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DESHAWN DUNDRE BROADNAX, No. 13-56134 Petitioner, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00560-GPC v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 9, 2014** Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. California state prisoner Deshawn Dundre Broadnax appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his28 U.S.C. § 2254
habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 2253
. We review de novo the denial of a habeas * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). corpus petition, see Fairbank v. Ayers,650 F.3d 1243
, 1250 (9th Cir. 2011), and we affirm. Broadnax contends that the trial court erred in refusing to order a new trial in light of new evidence that he could have used to impeach a state’s witness, who was charged as Broadnax’s codefendant. Broadnax’s allegation that the trial court misapplied California’s rules for new trials does not state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. See28 U.S.C. § 2254
(a); Estelle v. McGuire,502 U.S. 62
, 67-68 (1991). We construe Broadnax’s additional arguments, including his allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct under Brady v. Maryland,373 U.S. 83
(1963), as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 22-1(e); Hiivala v. Wood,195 F.3d 1098
, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). Broadnax’s motion to stay and abey these proceedings to permit him to exhaust previously unavailable claims in state court is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 13-56134