DocketNumber: 19-72785
Filed Date: 8/23/2021
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/23/2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDGAR ZAZUETA SANCHEZ, No. 19-72785 Petitioner, Agency No. A087-913-836 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 17, 2021** Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Edgar Zazueta Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr,947 F.3d 1238
, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because Zazueta Sanchez failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. See Aden v. Holder,589 F.3d 1040
, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Garcia-Milian v. Holder,755 F.3d 1026
, 1033-35 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that petitioner did not establish the necessary “state action” for CAT relief). We reject as unsupported by the record Zazueta Sanchez’s contentions that the BIA ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of his claim. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 19-72785