United States v. Robert Hanrahan

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10179
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00119-WBS-1
v.
ROBERT HANRAHAN, AKA Bubba, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Robert Hanrahan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion to clarify the amended judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Hanrahan does not dispute that the amended judgment reduced his federal
sentence by the time he served on his state sentence to effectuate the district
court’s intent to run the two sentences concurrently. However, he argues that the
district court should have further clarified the sentence by adding a citation to
U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b) in the judgment. As the district court explained, the amended
judgment accurately reflects the sentence it intended to impose. Adding a citation
to § 5G1.3(b) would not have provided any additional clarification and the district
court properly denied Hanrahan’s motion.
AFFIRMED.
2 21-10179