United States v. Jermaine Henderson

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 27 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30119
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:05-cr-05431-RBL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JERMAINE D. HENDERSON, a.k.a. Moet,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 23, 2017**
Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Jermaine D. Henderson appeals from the revocation of supervised release
and the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Henderson’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
record. We have provided Henderson the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm the revocation and sentence.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 16-30119