Hernandez Martinez v. Mukasey

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GLORIA HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ, No. 06-71010
Petitioner, Agency No. A079-544-164
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
**
Submitted September 13, 2010
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Gloria Hernandez Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming the
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal based on
her failure to establish the requisite hardship to her qualifying relatives.
Hernandez Martinez contends that the agency erred in finding that her
qualifying relatives will not suffer hardship if she is removed. We lack jurisdiction
to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioner failed to show
exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Martinez-
Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 06-71010