United States v. Daniel Sicairos

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10258
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00257-SRB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
DANIEL SOTO SICAIROS, a.k.a. Daniel
S. Soto, a.k.a. Daniel Soto-Cicairos, a.k.a.
Daniel Soto-Sicairos,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 13, 2015**
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Soto Sicairos appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 46-month sentence imposed on remand following his guilty-plea
conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Soto Sicairos’s counsel has
filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Soto Sicairos the opportunity to
file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 14-10258