United States v. Enrique Torres-Chairez

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 27 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10557
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01008-ROS
ENRIQUE TORRES-CHAIREZ, a.k.a.
Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique MEMORANDUM *
Torres,
Defendant - Appellant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10558
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:01-cr-01025-ROS
v.
ENRIQUE TORRES-CHAIREZ, a.k.a.
Linio Monsivais-Landero, a.k.a. Enrique
Torres,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Roslyn O. Silver, Chief Judge, Presiding
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Submitted May 24, 2011 **
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Enrique Torres-Chairez appeals from his
guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from the revocation of his supervised release and
eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Torres-Chairez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2 08-10557