DocketNumber: 10-55164
Judges: Schroeder, Alarcón, Leavy
Filed Date: 7/15/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 15 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TROY TERRELL COLEMAN, No. 10-55164 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-06447-GW v. MEMORANDUM * LINDA SANDERS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 12, 2011 ** Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Troy Terrell Coleman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his28 U.S.C. § 2241
habeas petition challenging the execution of his sentence. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 1291
, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Coleman contends that his federal sentence should have commenced on the date he was sentenced in the Northern District of Oklahoma for retaliating against a government witness, rather than on completion of his state term of imprisonment in California. This contention lacks merit. The district court correctly determined that, at the time Coleman was sentenced in the Northern District of Oklahoma, California had primary custody over him that remained uninterrupted until the state released him on parole. Accordingly, the Bureau of Prisons properly calculated Coleman’s sentence as beginning when California released him on parole. See18 U.S.C. § 3585
(a); see also Taylor v. Reno,164 F.3d 440
, 445 (9th Cir. 1998). Coleman also contends that his federal sentences should run concurrently, and not consecutively. This contention also lacks merit. The Bureau of Prisons properly calculated Coleman’s total term of imprisonment by running his federal sentences consecutive to each other, because Coleman was sentenced in two separate federal cases at different times. See18 U.S.C. § 3584
(a). AFFIRMED. 2 10-55164