Integrated Knowl. v. Integrated Knowl.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAY 16 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
In re: INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE No. 07-56818
MARKETING, INC.,
BAP No. CC-07-01115-PaBaK
Debtor,
MEMORANDUM *
EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP and
JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL,
LLP,
Appellants,
v.
INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE
MARKETING, INC., d/b/a IKM; et al.,
Appellees.
In re: INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE No. 07-56849
MARKETING, INC.,
BAP No. CC-07-01092-PaBaK
Debtor,
EZRA BRUTZKUS GUBNER LLP and
JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
LLP,
Appellants,
v.
INTEGRATED KNOWLEDGE
MARKETING, INC., d/b/a IKM; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Pappas, Klein, and Bardwil, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted May 10, 2011 **
San Francisco, California
Before: GOODWIN and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and O’GRADY, District Judge.***
Pursuant to 11 U.S.C § 327, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner L.L.P. and Jenkins Mulligan
& Gabriel L.L.P. were hired as joint special counsel to prosecute claims on behalf of
the Chapter 7 Trustee. They now appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s decision
affirming: (1) the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of the case; and (2) the bankruptcy
court’s separate order on administrative fees and costs. Substantially for the reasons
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See F ED. R. A PP. P. 34(a)(2).
***
The Honorable Liam O’Grady, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern
District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
2
stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s unpublished memorandum in this matter,
2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4845 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Nov. 6, 2007), we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
3