DocketNumber: 19-30000
Filed Date: 8/23/2019
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 8/23/2019
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30000 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:17-cr-02029-SMJ-1 v. MEMORANDUM* SALVADOR RUIZ-CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 19, 2019** Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Salvador Ruiz-Cortez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of21 U.S.C. § 841
(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), Ruiz-Cortez’s counsel has * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ruiz-Cortez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Ruiz-Cortez waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,488 U.S. 75
, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson,582 F.3d 974
, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. Seeid. at 988
. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 19-30000