Christian Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 17 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CHRISTIAN RODRIGUEZ, individually No. 13-55467
and a class representatives; ALBERTO
CAZAREZ, individually and a class D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01135-DMG-
representatives, JEM
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
ORDER*
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES; CARMEN
ANTHONY TRUTANICH; CHARLES
BECK; ALLAN NADIR; ANGEL
GOMEZ,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2013
Pasadena, California
Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Based on the parties’ submissions and supplemental briefing, we conclude
that this appeal is now moot. See, e.g., Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390,
398 (1981) (holding that “the question whether a preliminary injunction should
have been issued . . . is moot . . . [where] the terms of the injunction . . . have been
fully and irrevocably carried out.”). The case is remanded to the district court for
any further proceedings.