DocketNumber: 10-70245
Judges: Rymer, Ikuta, Smith
Filed Date: 8/8/2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 8 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HISKIA BILLY and ALVIN LENDE No. 10-70245 BILLY, Agency Nos. A078-020-248 Petitioners, A078-020-308 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted August 2, 2011 ** Before: RYMER, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Hiskia and Alvin Lende Billy, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under8 U.S.C. § 1252
. We review for abuse * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Morales Apolinar v. Mukasey,514 F.3d 893
, 895 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ July 6, 2009, motion to reconsider as untimely because it was filed over three years after the BIA’s February 15, 2006, final order. See8 C.F.R. § 1003.2
(b)(2). In light of our disposition, we need not consider petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s original analysis regarding whether they were members of a disfavored group was erroneous under Wakkary v. Holder,558 F.3d 1049
(9th Cir. 2009), and Tampubolon v. Holder,610 F.3d 1056
(9th Cir. 2010). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 10-70245