DocketNumber: 09-74083
Citation Numbers: 469 F. App'x 626
Judges: Fernandez, McKeown, Bybee
Filed Date: 2/29/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/5/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AMELIA REYES-JIMENEZ, No. 09-74083 Petitioner, Agency No. A089-814-074 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Amelia Reyes-Jimenez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by8 U.S.C. § 1252
. We dismiss the petition for review. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Reyes-Jimenez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her U.S. citizen children.8 U.S.C. § 1252
(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey,552 F.3d 975
, 979 (9th Cir. 2009). Reyes-Jimenez’s contention that the agency failed to properly consider and weigh all evidence of hardship under the proper legal standard does not raise a colorable legal or due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,424 F.3d 926
, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 09-74083