United States v. Richard Nguyen

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 22 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-50611
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00796-ABC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICHARD V. NGUYEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 13, 2014 **
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Richard V. Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and
12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Nguyen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
provided Nguyen the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 13-50611