DocketNumber: 11-56487
Judges: Goodwin, Canby, Callahan
Filed Date: 7/29/2014
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 11/6/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 29 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FERNANDO NELSON AYALA- No. 11-56487 RAMOS, a.k.a. Jose, a.k.a. Nelson Fernando Ramos-Ayala, D.C. Nos. 2:10-cv-07648-PA 2:09-cr-00242-PA Petitioner - Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 22, 2014** Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Fernando Nelson Ayala-Ramos appeals from the district court’s order denying his28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 2253
. We review de novo * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the district court’s denial of a section 2255 motion, see United States v. Aguirre- Ganceda,592 F.3d 1043
, 1045 (9th Cir. 2010), and we vacate and remand. Ayala-Ramos contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to comply with instructions to file a notice of appeal. The government agrees that this claim is controlled by United States v. Sandoval-Lopez,409 F.3d 1193
, 1197-98 (9th Cir. 2005), which holds that when counsel fails to follow a client’s instructions to file a notice of appeal, there is both deficient performance and prejudice. Accordingly, we vacate and remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the veracity of Ayala-Ramos’s allegation that counsel did not follow his instructions to file a notice of appeal. Seeid. at 1198
. Alternatively, if the government does not object, the district court may vacate and reenter the judgment in Ayala-Ramos’s criminal proceedings, allowing Ayala- Ramos to file a timely notice of appeal. Seeid.
VACATED and REMANDED with instructions. 2 11-56487