United States v. Justin Gladding

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10005
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00265-DAD-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JUSTIN PAUL GLADDING,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 12, 2021**
Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Justin Paul Gladding appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 4-month custodial sentence and 96-month term of supervised
release imposed following the court’s revocation of supervision. Pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gladding’s counsel has filed a brief
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Gladding the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 21-10005