DocketNumber: 09-70566
Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 744
Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima
Filed Date: 3/14/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 14 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEKSANDR KOVTOUN, No. 09-70566 Petitioner, Agency No. A075-499-355 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 6, 2012 ** Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. Aleksandr Kovtoun, a native and citizen of Moldova, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under8 U.S.C. § 1252
. We review for an abuse of discretion, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Toufighi v. Mukasey,538 F.3d 988
, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kovtoun’s motion to reopen because it considered the evidence submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining Kovtoun did not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for the relief sought. See INS v. Abudu,485 U.S. 94
, 104 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case for the underlying relief sought). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 09-70566