DocketNumber: 11-10009
Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 750
Judges: Fernandez, McKeown, Bybee
Filed Date: 3/14/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 14 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10009 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00883-SRB-1 District of Arizona, v. Phoenix JOSE MANUEL RODRIGUEZ- ALVAREZ, ORDER Defendant - Appellant. Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Plaintiff's motion to amend the memorandum disposition is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on March 5, 2012 is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order. FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 14 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S . CO U RT OF AP PE A LS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10009 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00883-SRB-1 v. MEMORANDUM * JOSE MANUEL RODRIGUEZ- ALVAREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Alvarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. y 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,386 U.S. 738
(1967), Rodriguez- * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Alvarez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Rodriguez- Alvarez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,488 U.S. 75
, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 11-10009