DocketNumber: 10-17750
Citation Numbers: 471 F. App'x 783
Judges: Fletcher, Reinhardt, Tashima
Filed Date: 3/15/2012
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 15 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIE BAILEY, III, No. 10-17750 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:04-cv-02067-GEB- EFB v. J. WEDELL; et al., MEMORANDUM * Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 6, 2012 ** Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. Willie Bailey, III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his42 U.S.C. § 1983
action alleging that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under28 U.S.C. § 1291
. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung,391 F.3d 1051
, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bailey failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants Penner, Turella, or Howard were involved in or had any control over ordering, scheduling, or performing the relevant surgeries. See Taylor v. List,880 F.2d 1040
, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989) (no respondeat superior liability under § 1983; plaintiff must show personal involvement in alleged violations); Leer v. Murphy,844 F.2d 628
, 633 (9th Cir. 1988) (“A person deprives another of a constitutional right, within the meaning of section 1983, if he does an affirmative act, participates in another’s affirmative acts, or omits to perform an act which he is legally required to do that causes the deprivation of which the plaintiff complains.” (alteration, citation, and internal quotation marks omitted)). Bailey’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. AFFIRMED. 2 10-17750