DocketNumber: 20-35710
Filed Date: 12/21/2021
Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/21/2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 21 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RANDY L. HOGE, Jr., No. 20-35710 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-00244-JR v. MEMORANDUM* SUSEE, Deputy; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2021** Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Randy L. Hoge, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his civil rights action for failure to comply with a court order. We have jurisdiction under28 U.S.C. § 1291
. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pagtalunan v. Galaza,291 F.3d 639
, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm. The district court dismissed Hoge’s initial complaint because it failed to state a claim of retaliation for the filing of a grievance when Hoge was a pretrial detainee, and the court advised Hoge that the action would be dismissed if he did not file an amended complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b); Entler v. Gregoire,872 F.3d 1031
, 1040 (9th Cir. 2017) (elements of First Amendment retaliation claim). Instead of filing an amended complaint, Hoge filed a motion to amend. Because the additional information included in the motion to amend would not have cured the deficiencies in the complaint, the district court properly exercised its discretion in dismissing with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order. See Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Lichtenegger,913 F.3d 884
, 891 (9th Cir. 2019) (setting forth factors district court must consider in dismissing under Rule 41(b)). All pending motions are denied. AFFIRMED. 2